This is one in a series of videos exploring the case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562. The case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100 is one of the celebrated cases that must be mentioned when determining when a duty of care exist in negligence. Donoghue v stevenson made it clear that, even without a contract between the parties, a duty of care is owed by a to take reasonable care to avoid acts or. His enthusiasm for the famous scottish case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 s.
The events of the case took place in paisley, scotland in 1928. Secondly, there has been some dispute about the facts. Now the issue before all the courts was a purely legal one. Donoghue drank some of the contents and her friend lifted the bottle to pour. Sir harry gibbs legal heritage centre supreme court. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 this piece will move towards english tort law and scots delict law by taking a view at the famous donoghue v stevenson case. It sets donoghue v stevenson in its historical context and reevaluates the evidence. The mollusc in question was a common snail that ended its days in a bottle of ginger beer. It laid the foundation of the modern law of negligence, establishing general principles of the duty of care. She suffered great mental shock and severe gastroenteritis.
Donoghue then appealed further to the house of lords, then the highest court in the uk for civil cases from scotland. It created the modern concept of negligence, by setting out general principles whereby one person would owe a duty of care to another person. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 house of lords mrs donoghue went to a cafe with a friend. It begins on an unremarkable sunday evening on 26th august 1928. Donoghue v stevenson laid the foundation for the modern law of negligence and established the principles of the duty of care.
When the bottle arrived, the waiter poured a portion into a glass tumbler. Discover an online course and start learning a new skill today free 100%. Bbc news the legal case of the snail found in ginger beer. Negligence caparo test proximity simple question negligence duty of care answering technique urgent donoghue v stevenson case duty of care tort law negligence problem question. Animated video of one of the leading case of donoghue versus stevenson 1932 in simple, easiest and animated form to know the brief about the case by animated legal cases. The principle established in donoghue v stevenson was seen as an important milestone in the history of tort law as it was the first successful attempt to set out a general principle with respect to the concept of the duty of care. Look up the case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562. This was appealed successfully by the defendant, mr stevenson, to a higher court. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 chapter 4 page 165 relevant facts on 26 august 1928, may donoghue met a friend at a cafe in paisley. In this video, we begin this series by simplifying the seminal case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100.
The snail and the ginger beer tells the full story of this remarkable case. Stevenson, also known as the snail in the bottle case, is a significant case in western law. It is requested that an image or photograph of the new memorial to donoghue v stevenson, located in paisley, be included in this article to improve its quality. Since appearing on youtube on 2 march 2007, a donoghue v stevensoninspired parody of the polices message in a bottle has. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 sir harry gibbs legal. In introducing negligence as a tort in its own right, it has not only increased available remedies but also taken over other fields where it. The cafe purchased the product from a distributor that purchased it from stevenson. Business law donoghue v stevenson case study essay bartleby. If you where to ask a lawyer today what case they think is the most famous case in legal history most would say without hesitation the case of donoghue v. Download my very first guest appearance on a podcast. Matthews referred to last was raised in the case of george v. Lords buckmaster and tomlin dismissed the appeal, which means they decided in favour of the defendant mr stevenson that there was no legal duty of care owed to mrs donoghue. It created the modern concept of negligence, by setting out general principles whereby one person would owe a duty of care to another person also known as the paisley snail 5 6 or snail in the bottle case, the facts involved mrs donoghue drinking a bottle of.
As a result of the remain, donoghue suffered from nervous shock and gastroenteritis. It made legal history in the 1932 case of donoghue v stevenson. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100 was a landmark court decision in scots delict law and english tort law by the house of lords. The dispute was ruled in favour of the plaintiff donoghue, which consequently established the modern concept of negligence. Donoghue or mcalister v stevenson, 1932 all er rep 1. The ratio decidendi in the case was that the liability of negligence did not depend on the contractual relationship and that stevenson owed the duty of care to donohue as a manufacturer, not to cause foreseeable injuries to the users of the products. Tort law duty of care neighbour principle main arguments in this case. It laid the foundational principle for the modern law of negligence. Its the 7 year anniversary of the best law video ever made legal. Needless to say, i was in, even before gaining a full appreciation of martins mastery of the subject of donoghue v. Its the 7 year anniversary of the best law video ever made. The case of donoghue v stevenson 1932 is very important, as it set a major precedent the legal concept of duty of care in the 1932 case, the judge, lord aitken, defined the neighbour principle. The ruling in this case established the civil law tort of negligence and obliged businesses to observe a duty of care towards their customers.
Many treat donoghue as if it were the greatest of all great cases. Presented by dr professor kit barker, the university of queensland. Donoghue v stevenson the case about the snail in the ginger beer in a wee cafe in paisley. Stevenson has not only influenced the english product liability law. Visit our learning resources page for videos, papers and worksheets. Donoghues journey fired my imagination and the concepts of duty of care, foreseeability, and proximity seemed no less magical than the transmutation of base metals into noble ones. Then came the test in anns v merton which was overruled by murphy v. Donoghue v stevenson donoghue sued the manufacturer of a bottle of ginger beer that she drank which contained snail remnants. A majority decision is enough to decide the law and is one. The plaintiff donoghue received a ginger beer bottle bought for her by a friend from a cafe.
She drank some of it, and found out that there are remains of a decomposed snail in it. The ginger beer came in an opaque bottle so that the contents could not be seen. In 1932 lord atkin handed down a judgment that would become one of the most significant cases of the common law world, donoghue v stevenson. Critically analyze this statement in the light of lord atkins judgement in donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100 250 words for it. An independent tort which consists of a breach of legal duty to take care which results in damage undesired by the defendant. Donoghues companion ordered and paid for her drink.
Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible wikipedians in scotland may be able to help the free image search tool may be able to locate suitable images on flickr and other web sites. Section a question 1 a in the case of donohue v stevenson1, donohue won the case. Donoghue v stevenson, uk law online 1 of 30 11142003 9. Due to a change of staff in the university of otago law faculty, the. Donoghue attempted to claim against the manufacturer of the ginger beer stevenson claimed that he owed her a duty.
Mrs donoghue poured half the contents of the bottle over her ice cream and also drank some from the bottle. A fun shortfilm recreating the events of the famous case of donoghue v stevenson 1932. The story of donoghue v stevenson 1932 ac 562 duration. Lord atkins judgement in donoghue vs stevenson ukhl 100 coursework sample instructions. She sought damages against the manufacturer, stevenson, from the resulting nervous shock and gastroenteritis, which she claimed was caused through the incident. However, later the courts started to acknowledge that the neighbour principle was too simplistic and limited in scope. Donoghue, a scottish dispute, is a famous case in english law which was instrumental in shaping the law of tort and the doctrine of negligence in particular. Donoghue v stevenson is an incredibly significant case in the development of the law. The bottle contained the decomposing remains of a snail though this was not visible. Donoghues friend purchased her a bottle of ginger beer. The case of donoghue v stevenson is widely known in legal circles, not just in scotland and the uk but throughout the world, as the source of the modern law of negligence. The ginger beer came in a dark bottle, and the contents were not visible from the outside. It provides vivid biographical sketches of the protagonists and of the great lawyers who were involved in the case.
View on westlaw or start a free trial today, donoghue v stevenson 1932 a. Mrs donoghue sued mr stevenson based on the law of delict referred to as the law of negligence in england and wales. Get your kindle here, or download a free kindle reading app. Donoghue v stevenson project gutenberg selfpublishing. May donoghue has had a huge impact on millions of peoples lives around the world. Donoghue consumed some of the product after which the decomposed remains of a snail emerged from the bottle when the remaining ginger beer was poured into her glass. If there were indeed a duty not to cause damage to another carelessly, there would be no need to establish the existence of a duty in each case, since this would be implied in all situations. Skivington where there was an injury to one person, the wife, and a contract of salewhere there was an injury to one person, the wife, and a contract of sale. The friend brought her a bottle of ginger beer and an ice cream. Lord aitken stated that a neighbour was anyone who is so closely and directly affected by my act, or failure to act, that i ought reasonably to have them in my. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 case summary webstroke law. The singular case of donoghue v stevenson matthew chapman on.
The drink was manufactured by the defendant stevenson. It is perhaps most well known for the statement of lord aitkins regarding the existence of. Before the caparo test, the donoghue v stevenson test neighbourhood principle per lord atkin was used to establish negligence. In the initial hearing, the judge found in favour of the pursuer mrs donoghue. Negligence as a mode of committing certain torts trespass, nuisance or defamation. Discuss the significance of donoghue v stevenson to the. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 law of tort legal case youtube. Donoghue v stevenson 1932 ukhl 100 was a foundational decision in scots delict law and english tort law by the house of lords. A night out in paisley on the evening in question, may donoghue, at that time a 30yearold shop assistant, boarded a tram in glasgow for the thirtyminute journey to. The friend ordered and paid for a bottle of ginger of beer for donoghue. The courts in hearing this case found that the manufacturer owed donoghue a duty of care as she was their neighbour someone who was affected by your acts or omissions and they were reckless.
917 1139 521 1194 1133 810 903 1409 119 15 15 32 617 526 1238 751 87 1150 1429 814 1348 1266 785 559 971 315 1440 885 119 1229 699 1461 559 100 1423 1251 620 1257 523 928 1015